'

Wacom Protocol Overview

From linuxwacom
Jump to: navigation, search

Note: The original author of this page was late to the tablet party. I've never worked with a serial tablet or an serial ISDV4 tablet. This information was obtained by working with xf86-input-wacom code base, reviewing kernel drivers, and filling in some holes with guesses.

The protocols Wacom devices use can be broken into two pieces.

  • Communication Protocol - This is the request/response protocol that applications can use for querying both static and dynamic properties of the tablet as well as allow applications to configure those dynamic properties. The protocol also defines how to tell the difference between a response to a request and a data packet containing stylus/button/mouse/etc information.
  • Event Data Packet Format - This is the stylus/button/mouse/etc data that applications are really interested in. It is always in a compact binary format.

Since there are many different tablets with different feature set, there are a wide variety of Event Data Packet formats. The Communication Protocol though is much less feature centric and is shared among a much wider range of tablets.

There are 2 communication protocols in active use and 1 historical communication protocol. The historical protocol will be discussed first as the other 2 active protocols are somewhat related.

Serial Protocol 4/5

Wacom tablet popularity pre-dates the popularity of USB ports and were connected using serial ports. The communication looks vaguely like the AT protocol used with modems of same era. Requests are sent to the tablet using somewhat readable ASCII characters and the response back from tablet comes back in somewhat readable ASCII characters. The responses are structured enough so that applications can detect the difference between responses and event data packets.

The serial tablets all used the same communication protocol although not all tablets support the full configuration command set. Serial devices can be broken into two groups called Protocol 4 and Protocol 5 devices (I have no idea if protocol 1, 2, and 3 existed in the wild). These are also often referred to as Protocol IV and Protocol V.

The difference between those two "protocols" lies in the feature set of the tablets and not really in how they communicate to applications.

Protocol 5 devices return a unique serial # inside the event data packet for each stylus the user owns. This allows user to assign unique behaviour in an application to each stylus instead of having to create button macros to reconfigure the 1 visible stylus that the application see's. Another lesser feature is some models support more than 1 tool being in proximity at a time (multi-touch before multi-touch was popular!).

Protocol 4 devices do not return this serial # and this shows up as a different event data packet format.

Because Protocol 4 and Protocol 5 devices share the same communication protocol and because the serial tablets are no longer being sold, the terms Protocol 4 and Protocol 5 have come to be used more for tablet feature set then anything to do with the communication protocol. In fact, it is still used with USB devices to describe this same difference in feature set.

But to keep everyone on their toes, the term Protocol 4/5 is also used to refer to the original serial port communication protocol and its related command set.

See Serial Protocol IV for more information on this serial protocol.

Serial ISDV4 Protocol

A communication protocol still in use is for wacom devices that communicate over internal serial ports on Tablet PC's and it is called ISDV4. I've no idea what ISDV4 stands for other than ISD V4. It may be because they have more in common to Protocol 4 devices then they do to Protocol 5 devices (no serial #s). The communication protocol is a more compact than the original Protocol 4/5 protocol as binary data is used in responses. Also, it only supports a subset of the command set as Protocol 4/5 devices.

Depending on the hardware, this protocol can support 2 different Event Data Packets. One is used for typical stylus data while the other is used for touchscreen touch data.

See the ISDV4 Protocol page for further information.

HID-Wacom Protocol

The final communication protocol in use is what I'll call USB HID-Wacom. When serial tablets were replace with USB tablets, the designers leaned on the USB HID standard to declare itself. When communicating, the tablet can make use of a lot of the OS's HID infrastructure for reading static configuration values and reading/writing dynamic configuration values. Once configured, the device does not return data packets in standard HID format. Instead, it returns data in a format that looks like the original Protocol 4/5 Event Data Packets.

I've not compared like serial devices to like USB devices but there is a good chance they share exact same data packet formats.

Recently, several Tablet PC's that used to use serial ISDV4 links are now using USB links and sometimes have ISD V4 in their name. This can cause some confusion to end users since this devices do not use the serial ISDV4 Communication Protocol nor does their Event Data Packet formats look anything like ISDV4 packets. The ISDV4 name in this case is only indicating that its a Tablet PC using the HID-Wacom Communication Protocol along with the Tablet PC Event Packet format.

See the USB Protocol page for further information.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox